It looks like Divergence of Vladimir's Forex LST System is faster than MMM's TDI.
This situation leads to respective of advantage and disadvantage as we have to asses the divergence over the principle or how the reversal begin: Reversal initiated by a significant pullback/retrace against the trend.
Lets take the GBPUSD situation on Friday Apr 27th.
1. There were a 4 hours narrow consolidation on early asian session. At 4 - 6 GMT the price made 3 pushes down then around 6.15 GMT the signs of MMM created: a pin in to the blue/hammer just below M2 that rejected by TL, shark fin low, a big W with the first leg from the day before but NO DIVERGENCE.
On the other hand, LST caught this big W with NPN-MACD Bullish divergence sign that it was a strong/reliable sign.
This situation is advantage to Vladimir's LST but disadvantage to TDI Divergence's default set to 21.
This situation leads to respective of advantage and disadvantage as we have to asses the divergence over the principle or how the reversal begin: Reversal initiated by a significant pullback/retrace against the trend.
Lets take the GBPUSD situation on Friday Apr 27th.
1. There were a 4 hours narrow consolidation on early asian session. At 4 - 6 GMT the price made 3 pushes down then around 6.15 GMT the signs of MMM created: a pin in to the blue/hammer just below M2 that rejected by TL, shark fin low, a big W with the first leg from the day before but NO DIVERGENCE.
On the other hand, LST caught this big W with NPN-MACD Bullish divergence sign that it was a strong/reliable sign.
This situation is advantage to Vladimir's LST but disadvantage to TDI Divergence's default set to 21.
Look at this Vladimir's Forex LST System Template:
And this MMM's TDI:
2. Contrary situation during London-US session when Vladimir's LST made 2 bearish divergence while MMM's TDI just one bearish divergence. On the second Divergence of LST it was a strong/reliable sigh as it was a PNP-Divergence while the MMM's TDI made divergence as well. But on LST's first divergence was too early that result in trend resume. Indeed there was a 30 pips pullback/retrace but later trend resumed. Yet, the divergence was not a PNP (moderate reliability). At this time MMM's TDI hasn't yet made a divergence.
This was Disadvantage to Vladimir's LST while advantage to MMM's TDI.
So wich one is better, there would be no perfect answer. It's always depend on trader's human eye to treated the tools properly with the proper trading management.
Because, regarding to "significant pullback", the too early 1st divergence of Vladimir's LST was not a PNP Divergence after all (moderate realibility so if you treated the LST properly you will be safe.
But in the bullish divergence after asian session you would miss a 130 pips move by MMM's TDI. Yet LST already made 2 NPN-Divergence.
Two good thing that Vladimir's Forex LST System are superior over MMM's TDI is that the "Significant Pullback" signed by PNP/NPN-Divergence and you wouldn't miss a good move.
Its all depend on the trader to filter and confirm the good trade.
Click - Here to visit Vladimir's LST System website on Clickbank
